Heavy Truck manufacturer HEAVY TRUCK MANUFACTURER E X T E R I O R S T E P P E D A L • Offer pre-color support to achieve an approved silver color formulation • Provide a metallic look with good weather resistance and wear performance for the exterior part • Shorten development time to gain durability approval • Offered color options that met desired metal color and texture, which was different from an ordinary plastic feel • Achieved excellent wear performance and weather resistance, qualifying it to replace metal • Provided support in achieving durability approval, resulting in significant time and cost savings OnForce Long Glass Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites KEY REQUIREMENTS WHY AVIENT?

INDUSTRIAL FAN MANUFACTURER A X I A L F A N B L A D E • Replace aluminium alloy • Reduce thickness and weight of fan blade • Withstand 920 Pa of static pressure, high relative humidity (90-95%), and max temperature of 104ºF • Redesigned the 1600mm blade utilizing 3D modeling and mold flow analysis services from Avient Design • Simulated mechanical load to determine which new design would provide optimal performance • Increased strength using a carbon fiber grade, enabling injection-moldable parts and streamlined production • Reduced blade thickness to 35% of the original and blade weight from 7.71 lbs to 1.76 lbs (77% decrease) • Improved overall efficiency of fan with a thinner, lighter blade that cuts through the air Complēt Long Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic KEY REQUIREMENTS WHY AVIENT?

The boss should extend into the nominal wall of the part, to avoid a thick region and possible sink Figure 4 - Drafting Guidelines for Nominal Wall Thickness Cross section showing draft Figure 5 - Rib design guidelines 1/4˚—–1˚ 2.5W W 3W Min. .01" R Min. or .25W .75W for a low shrink material .50W for a high shrink material Figure 6 - Wall thickness changes due to rib placement 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 Rib-height (mm) M a x D is p la c e m e n t M a g n it u d e ( m m ) 0 FIGURE 4 - Drafing guidelines for nominal wall thickness FIGURE 5 - Rib design guidelines FIGURE 7 - Wall thickness changes due to rib placement FIGURE 6 - Rib height vs. stiffness 10 Gravi-Tech FIGURE 8 - Side Wall Boss Design Guidelines Sink Not Recommended Preferred Design A = Diameter = A = Primary Wall = A = 2A FIGURE 9 - Guidelines Design Guidelines 4W W 2W .75W For a Low Shrink Material .50W For a High Shrink Material FIGURE 9 - Side wall boss design guidelines FIGURE 10 - Gusset design guidelines FIGURE 11 - Structural hole design guidelines area . Unfortunately, this method only has limited durability and has a minimum amount of assembly repeatability .2 FIGURE 19 - Mechanical Fasteners Design Guidlines Potential high stress due to wedging action of screw head Potential high stress due to wedging action of screw head Poor DesignsPoor Designs Preferred DesignsPreferred Designs Planned gap between added bosses prevents excessive bending of hosing as bosses touch and go into compression Planned gap between added bosses prevents excessive bending of hosing as bosses touch and go into compression Alternative recessed head design avoids potentially dangerous wedging action Alternative recessed head design avoids potentially dangerous wedging action Truss or Round Head ScrewTruss or Round Head Screw Potential high bending stress as bolt is tightened Potential high bending stress as bolt is tightened Flat-head Screw Standard Screw Plastic Part Metal Sub-frame Shoulder Screw Plastic Part Metal Casting FIGURE 20 - Mechanical fasteners design guidelines F= π × µ × DShaft 1engage × σH W I = D – 0.373 = 0.0002" σH = 1 × W DShaft W + v E( ) σH = = 200psi 0.002 × 1.998 0.375 1.998 + 0.4 450000( ) W = = 1.998 1 – 0.375 0.650( ) 2 1 + 0.375 0.650( ) 2 W = DShaft ODHub 1 – ( )2 DShaft ODHub ( )21 + FIGURE 16 - Interference fit variable F= π × µ × DShaft 1engage × σH W I = D – 0.373 = 0.0002" σH = 1 × W DShaft W + v E( ) σH = = 200psi 0.002 × 1.998 0.375 1.998 + 0.4 450000( ) W = = 1.998 1 – 0.375 0.650( ) 2 1 + 0.375 0.650( ) 2 W = DShaft ODHub 1 – ( )2 DShaft ODHub ( )21 + FIGURE 17 - Geometry factor variable F= π × µ × DShaft 1engage × σH W I = D – 0.373 = 0.0002" σH = 1 × W DShaft W + v E( ) σH = = 200psi 0.002 × 1.998 0.375 1.998 + 0.4 450000( ) W = = 1.998 1 – 0.375 0.650( ) 2 1 + 0.375 0.650( ) 2 W = DShaft ODHub 1 – ( )2 DShaft ODHub ( )21 + FIGURE 18 - Hoop stress equation F= π × µ × DShaft 1engage × σH W I = D – 0.373 = 0.0002" σH = 1 × W DShaft W + v E( ) σH = = 200psi 0.002 × 1.998 0.375 1.998 + 0.4 450000( ) W = = 1.998 1 – 0.375 0.650( ) 2 1 + 0.375 0.650( ) 2 W = DShaft ODHub 1 – ( )2 DShaft ODHub ( )21 + FIGURE 19 - Press fit pull-out force .400 .500 .375 .373 .650 FIGURE 15 - Press fit example Design Guide 13 ADHESIVE TYPES A chart containing the various specific adhesive types, with advantages and disadvantages of both can be seen in the appendix. SERIES PARALLEL Pressure Drop High Low Flow Rates Consistent Variable Temperature Rise Potential Large Small Horsepower Requirements Higher Lower Reynolds Numbers Higher Lower FIGURE 37 - Parallel vs series cooling line layout Part FIGURE 36 - Parallel cooling line layout Plastic Molding Draft Angle Mold Core Ffriction Fnormal Feject FIGURE 38 - Friction force Can use larger pin at intersections FIGURE 39 - Ejection pin layout Design Guide 19 FIGURE 39 - Sripper Plate Core Block Core Insert Stipper Plate Ejector Pin Bolts Ejector Pin FIGURE 40 - Ejector sleeve Land = 3*D 0.001 in 0.02 mm 0.020 in 0.5 mm D FIGURE 42 - Ejector pin design guidelines FIGURE 41 - Stripper plate Stripper Plate This type of ejector is often used with round parts to provide a constant ejection force on the entire part .

For both product lines, a “D” designates a TPE based on SBS or SIS, while a “G” designates a TPE based on SEBS or SEPS.

The Shore D durometer is more appropriate when hardness levels are above 90 Shore A.

Dynaflex D

TPEs made from styrenic block copolymers (SBC) such as Kraton® D or G Polymers have special properties that can enhance the success of a finished part.

特点 电线和电缆 高度阻燃 毒性和烟密度极低 不同级层间可交联 可与色母料、添加剂浓缩液、紫外稳定剂一同加工 高度阻燃 毒性和烟密度极低 适合进行挤压和注射成型 管和配件 材料（ECCOH） 5924C 5920 5511C 5806UV 5127UV 5549/1 8300-8001 8300-8003 8300-8008 1125C 1052C 5309 5995/1C 5555C 5286 3140-3 6151 5865C XLS8002 6649 中低压电缆 光缆 机车/船 光缆 电缆/光缆 电子线 电缆 电子线 电子线 电缆 机车缆护套 电缆/光缆 电缆 机车缆 电缆 电缆/光缆 电缆 电缆 电缆/光缆 应用 热老化等级 热塑性 √ √ √ √交联型 交联方式 密度48 熔融指数（150℃/21.6kg） 硬度shore D 拉伸强度MPa 断裂伸长率% 氧指数% 耐环境应力开裂ESCR 阻燃性能 低温性能 耐油性能 耐UV性能 耐泥浆性能 低摩擦性能 产地 有焰（1mm）ASTM E662 无焰（1mm） 70 235 C类 √ √ √ 中国 45 265 中国 68 275 √ √ √ 欧洲 210 √ C类 中国 1.49~1.51 4.0 54 12.5 200 36 1.47 3.5 55 14 210 34 1.53 0.8 56 14 150 40 1.51 1 47 9.5 170 38 1.46 3.8 54 15.5 180 32 √ 中国 1.6 2.9 49 11.7 170 45 CPR B √ √ 中国/欧洲 1.29 13.5 48 17.5 345 27 FT-2 中国 1.27 9.5 48 13 360 29 90 190 √ 中国 1.49 8 53 15.7 245 35 63 180 √ 中国 1.54 2.7 55 11.5 180 40 106 214 CPR C √ √ 中国 1.5 8 50 12.5 180 34 84 206 C类 √ 中国 1.5 1.6 46 14 250 39 √ √ √ 欧洲 1.48 3 46 11 215 36 √ √ 欧洲 1.6 2.8 48 10.3 165 41 √ √ √ 欧洲 1.58 4.2 48 12.4 160 46 CPR B √ 欧洲 1.46 6 53 17 160 33 39 143 √ 欧洲 1.51 4 53 11.5 170 43 50 150 √ √ √ 中国 1.54 2.3 56 11.5 155 35 D类 中国 1.5 5.8 12 250 27 FT-2 中国 1.35 10 49 15 320 28 FT-2 中国 辐照/硅烷 辐照 辐照 辐照 辐照 辐照 自交联/水浴辐照/硅烷 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 90℃ 90℃ 90℃ 105℃ 90℃ 105℃ 125℃ 105℃ 105℃ 105℃ 90℃ 90℃ 90℃105℃ 105℃ 105℃ 105℃ 105℃ 加工方式（挤出） 材料性能:热塑状态（非交联后） 烟密度（最大） 特殊性能 ECCOH™低烟、无卤解决方案

AJUSTAR LA ADHERENCIA MEZCLANDO VERSAFLEX PF Grosor de la película: LDPE de 39 micras/Versaflex PF de 13 micras F = Adherencia final después de 7 días a 25° C i = Adherencia inicial después de 20 minutos a 25° C Re si st en ci a al d es pr en di m ie nt o so br e ac er o, N /2 5 m m . Re si st en ci a al d es pr en di m ie nt o so br e ac er o, N /2 5 m m .

D) Corresponding tensile data showing property retention for treatment groups relative to their respective controls. 7© 2021 Avient Corporation, 33587 Walker Road, Avon Lake, Ohio USA 44012 The combination of visual observation and mechanical properties afforded an ESCR rating as described previously, which is summarized in Table 3A for healthcare disinfectants and Table 3B for common household/consumer disinfectants tested in this study. P.; Pollock, D. A.; Cardo, D.