https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=3486
GREY PBT CONN 2
UV GREEN PVC
FOREST GREEN PP
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=6375
LT GREEN PCR
DK GREEN PCR
PBT ACCENT LT GREY CMPD
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=7050
LT GREEN PP
DK GREEN TPX
WHITE PBT UV
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=4122
YELLOW PBT 4%
GREEN
GREEN
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=52
GREEN
092BU2004 BLUE PBT
GREEN 3435C
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=6867
GREEN 410-GA ABS 3
GREEN 410-GA ABS A380 3
PBT CONCEPT WHITE UV CL00350
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=51
GREEN TPE
GREEN
092OR2001 ORANGE PBT
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=2208
GREEN TINT
GREEN GLO GREEN
PBT GRAY 427
https://www.avient.com/resources/safety-data-sheets?page=6648
MC-24963PU GREEN
MG GREEN
092GN403 GREEN PBT
https://www.avient.com/sites/default/files/2025-02/Hexagon and digimat case study.pdf
Figure 1: Tensile test data as a function of the fibre orientation 0°
(orange), 45° (green), 90° (blue)
https://www.hexagonmi.com
Figure 4: Failure location in the flexural test for the isotropic modelling
Figure 6: Failure location in the tensile test for the isotropic modelling
approach (left), Digimat anisotropic modelling approach (middle) and
reality (right)
Figure 3: Flexural test results with the isotropic modelling approach
(orange) and Digimat anisotropic modelling approach (green)
Figure 5: Tensile test results with the isotropic modelling approach
(orange) and Digimat anisotropic modelling approach (green)
Figure 5 shows the tensile test results with, again,
a convincing advantage for the Digimat anisotropic
modelling approach against the isotropic modelling
approach.